Lesslie Newbigin on Election

Ξ September 28th, 2008 | → 1 Comments | ∇ Cultural Architect Stuff |

No one can say why it is that one was chosen and another not, why it is that here the word came “not only in word only, but also in power, and in the Holy Ghost” (1 Thess. 1:5), while there the same word carried no regenerating power. The answer to that question is known only to God. But if we cannot know for what reason one was chosen, we can most certain know for what purpose he was chosen: he was chosen in order to be a fruit-bearing branch in the one true vine (John 15:16), a witness through whom others might be saved. He is chosen in order that through him God’s saving purpose may reach to others, and they too be reconciled to God in and through His reconciled and reconciling people…

And we can also see that wherever the missionary character of the doctrine of election is forgotten; wherever it is forgotten that we are chosen in order to be sent; wherever the minds of believers are concerned more to probe backwards from their election into the reasons for it in the secret counsel of God than to press forward from their election to the purpose of it, which is that they should be Christ’s ambassadors and witnesses to the ends of the earth; wherever men think that the purpose of election is their own salvation rather than the salvation of the world; then God’s people have betrayed their trust.”

Lesslie Newbigin

Thanks to my friend Todd Hiestand for beating me to posting this quote to my blog… during this time of “election” I hope if your a Christian this will be at the forefront of your mind. Have a great day!

 

Comments

This entry was posted on Sunday, September 28th, 2008 at 7:49 am and is filed under Cultural Architect Stuff. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
1 Comment so far

  1. Greg on September 29, 2008 10:50 am

    I was watching a PBS documentary on Ronald Reagan the other night and it was interesting how, after his failed assassination, Mother Teresa quietly met with him. His whole world view refocused to something similar to what Lesslie is talking about where he felt a great pressure to make his position meaningful to the country he served.

    Whether or not you think he did this is another story but it would be interesting to hear from previous presidents on their views of being placed into that position. I just hope we can get someone other than Rick Warren to do the interview. ;)

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Share your wisdom